- Veterinary View Box
- Posts
- How Much Is Normal? CT Myelography Benchmarks for the Healthy Warmblood Cervical Spine
How Much Is Normal? CT Myelography Benchmarks for the Healthy Warmblood Cervical Spine
Equine Vet J. 2025
Maren Hellige; Caroline Schröder; Frauke Seehusen; Jessika-M. Cavalleri; Karl Rohn; Peter Stadler; Florian Geburek
Background
Computed tomographic myelography (CTM) and radiographic myelography (RxM) are commonly used to diagnose extradural spinal cord compression in horses, particularly in cases of suspected cervical vertebral compressive myelopathy. While flexion of the cervical spine is routinely employed to enhance lesion detection, normal reference values for spinal cord diameter, contrast column distribution, and sagittal ratios in unaffected horses—especially Warmbloods—are poorly defined. This lack of normative data complicates interpretation and increases the risk of false-positive diagnoses.
Methods
This terminal in vivo method-comparison study included 13 neurologically normal Warmblood horses with histological confirmation of absence of spinal pathology. All horses underwent RxM and CTM of the cervical spine (C1–C7) under general anaesthesia in both neutral and flexed positions. Measurements at C3–C4 included inter- and intravertebral sagittal ratios, sagittal diameter of the spinal cord, and heights of dorsal and ventral contrast columns at predefined intra- and intervertebral locations. Measurements were performed independently by two observers on three occasions to assess repeatability and observer agreement.
Results
Flexion of the cervical spine resulted in a significant reduction in spinal cord diameter at intervertebral locations on CTM, but not on RxM. Both CTM and RxM demonstrated significant decreases in dorsal and ventral contrast column heights at intervertebral locations during flexion. The ventral contrast column showed the greatest reduction, occasionally becoming undetectable in flexion on CTM despite absence of pathology. Inter- and intravertebral sagittal ratios did not differ significantly between CTM and RxM in either position, although individual CTM measurements in normal horses fell below previously proposed radiographic cut-off values. Intraobserver reliability was excellent, and interobserver reliability ranged from fair to good.
Limitations
The study population was small and consisted of mature Warmblood horses without neurological disease, limiting generalizability to younger horses or those with cervical instability. Only the C3–C4 region was evaluated. Radiographs were not calibrated for magnification, precluding direct comparison of absolute measurements between modalities. Additionally, the contrast agent used for intrathecal injection is not routinely recommended, although its use was justified by the terminal study design.
Conclusions
Flexion of the cervical spine significantly reduces spinal cord diameter and myelographic contrast column heights at C3–C4 in Warmblood horses without spinal pathology. Normal CTM measurements can overlap with values previously considered pathological on radiographs, indicating that established radiographic thresholds cannot be directly applied to CTM. These findings provide important reference data and highlight the need for CTM-specific diagnostic criteria to improve differentiation between normal variation and clinically relevant spinal cord compression.

Mid sagittal CT myelography at C3–C4. Cranial is to the left. a = minimal intravertebral diameter of C3; b = minimal intervertebral diameter; c = maximum diameter of the cranial extremity at C3; d = maximal diameter of the cranial extremity at C4. For the intravertebral sagittal ratio the minimal intravertebral height of the vertebral canal was divided by the maximum diameter of the cranial extremity of the corresponding vertebral body. Intravertebral sagittal ratio of C3 . For the intervertebral sagittal ratio, the minimal distance between the cranial aspect of the dorsal lamina of C4 and the caudodorsal aspect of the caudal extremity of C3 or the caudal aspect of the dorsal lamina of the vertebral arch of C3 and the craniodorsal aspect of cranial extremity of C4 was divided by the maximum height of the cranial extremity of C4. Intervertebral sagittal ratio
How did we do? |
Disclaimer: The summary generated in this email was created by an AI large language model. Therefore errors may occur. Reading the article is the best way to understand the scholarly work. The figure presented here remains the property of the publisher or author and subject to the applicable copyright agreement. It is reproduced here as an educational work. If you have any questions or concerns about the work presented here, reply to this email.