- Veterinary View Box
- Posts
- Return to work after palmaroproximal metacarpal injury in race horses
Return to work after palmaroproximal metacarpal injury in race horses
JAVMA 2023
Thomas O. C. Ratcliffe BVM&S, Paul Robinson BVSC, DACVS , and Sarah M. Rosanowski BSc, PGDip VCS, PhD
Background: Thoroughbred racehorses often suffer from injuries to the palmaroproximal metacarpus, which can affect their performance and career. MRI is a useful diagnostic tool to assess the extent and severity of these injuries.
Study: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the prognosis for Thoroughbred racehorses with different types of injuries to the palmaroproximal metacarpus diagnosed with MRI.
Methods: The study included 29 flat racing Thoroughbreds at the Hong Kong Jockey Club that underwent MRI between 2014 and 2022. The horses were categorized based on MRI diagnosis: (1) proximal suspensory ligament (PSL) involvement only, (2) PSL and concurrent proximal third metacarpal (MC3) bone involvement, and (3) proximal MC3 bone involvement only. The outcomes measured were return to galloping or racing, and reinjury.
Results: The results showed that 92% of horses returned to galloping and 67% of horses returned to racing, with a low reinjury rate of 18%. Horses with concurrent injury to both the PSL and proximal MC3 bone took longer to return to gallop and had a higher reinjury rate than those with PSL involvement alone.
Limitations: The study had some limitations, such as the small sample size, the lack of a control group, the variability in rehabilitation protocols, and the possible influence of other factors such as age, sex, and racing class on the outcomes.
Conclusions: The study concluded that injuries involving both PSL and proximal MC3 bone concurrently require a longer rehabilitation period than those with PSL involvement alone. MRI can help to identify these injuries and guide the prognosis and management of Thoroughbred racehorses.
Diagnosis of 29 horses with injury to the palmaroproximal aspect of the metacarpus using low-field MRI and categories for diagnosis.
How did we do? |
Disclaimer: The summary generated in this email was created by an AI large language model. Therefore errors may occur. Reading the article is the best way to understand the scholarly work. The figure presented here remains the property of the publisher or author and subject to the applicable copyright agreement. It is reproduced here as an educational work. If you have any questions or concerns about the work presented here, reply to this email.