• Veterinary View Box
  • Posts
  • TMTJ Spurs require intraarticular analgesia to confirm clinical significance.

TMTJ Spurs require intraarticular analgesia to confirm clinical significance.

Equine Vet J., 2010

A Fairburn, S Dyson, R Murray

Background
Osseous spurs on the dorsoproximal aspect of the third metatarsal bone (MtIII) are common findings in horses; however, their clinical significance, particularly in relation to lameness, distal tarsal joint pain, and proximal suspensory desmitis (PSD), remains unclear. The study aimed to verify the anatomical sites of insertion for specific tendons and ligaments to distinguish osteophytes and entheseophytes radiologically and assess the frequency and associations of these spurs in different clinical groups.

Methods
A retrospective analysis of 455 horses with tarsal radiographs was conducted. Horses were categorized into five groups: clinically normal (Group 1) and those with hindlimb lameness caused by PSD, distal tarsal joint pain, or other conditions (Groups 2–5). Radiographs were evaluated for the presence, characteristics, and orientation of osseous spurs. Statistical associations were analyzed between spur presence and lameness, diagnostic groups, and radiological grades of distal tarsal joint abnormalities. Dissections of two cadaveric tarsi were performed to confirm insertion sites of tendons and ligaments.


Results
Osseous spurs were observed in 25% of horses, with 13% having bilateral spurs. There was no significant association between spur presence and lameness or specific diagnostic groups. However, spurs were significantly associated with higher radiological grades of abnormalities in the tarsometatarsal (TMT) and centrodistal (CD) joints. Spurs were predominantly located on the dorsal or dorsolateral aspect of MtIII. The study could not reliably differentiate osteophytes from entheseophytes due to overlapping insertion sites of the tibialis cranialis, fibularis tertius tendons, and the dorsal metatarsal ligament.


Limitations
The study was retrospective and single-point, with no follow-up to assess progression of spurs or development of lameness over time. Additionally, the generalizability to the wider horse population is limited due to the study's referral-based sample. Radiographs were assessed by a single analyst, and the study did not evaluate clinical outcomes directly linked to observed spurs.


Conclusions
Osseous spurs on the dorsoproximal aspect of MtIII are often incidental findings with no strong correlation to lameness but may indicate osteoarthritis (OA) in the distal tarsal joints. Their clinical significance must be confirmed with intra-articular analgesia. Long-term prospective studies are needed to elucidate the progression and relevance of these spurs in the context of joint health and performance.

Group 1 = no lameness; Group 2 = hindlimb lameness caused by proximal suspensory desmitis (PSD); Group 3 = hindlimb lameness caused by distal tarsal joint pain (DTP); Group 4 = hindlimb lameness caused by PSD and DTP; Group 5 = other cause of hindlimb lameness. Spur frequency = presence of an osseous spur on the dorsoproximal aspect of the third metatarsal bone; CD = Centrodistal joint; TMT = Tarsometatarsal joint; TMT  CD abnormalities = radiological abnormalities present in one or both of the centrodistal and tarsometatarsal joints.

How did we do?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Disclaimer: The summary generated in this email was created by an AI large language model. Therefore errors may occur. Reading the article is the best way to understand the scholarly work. The figure presented here remains the property of the publisher or author and subject to the applicable copyright agreement. It is reproduced here as an educational work. If you have any questions or concerns about the work presented here, reply to this email.